From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latham v. Ohio Parole Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 6, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-488 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-488

10-06-2015

DANA LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. OHIO PAROLE BOARD, et al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 8)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on September 16, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 8). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1);
3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore, Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis;

4. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this civil action is TERMINATED in this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/6/15

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Latham v. Ohio Parole Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 6, 2015
Case No. 1:15-cv-488 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Latham v. Ohio Parole Bd.

Case Details

Full title:DANA LATHAM, Plaintiff, v. OHIO PAROLE BOARD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-488 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 6, 2015)

Citing Cases

Stone v. Ohio Parole Bd.

Even so, to the extent Plaintiff sought to sue the OPB, “[t]he Ohio Parole Board is a section within the…

Pough v. DeWine

Initially, to the extent Plaintiff seeks to sue the Ohio Parole Board as a distinct entity, "[t]he Ohio…