From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laster v. Pramstaller

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 25, 2009
Case No. 06-13508, 05-71140 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 06-13508, 05-71140.

February 25, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Quentin Laster, a pro se prison inmate, has renewed his request for the appointment of counsel [Docket #66 in Case #06-13508, Docket #75 in Case No. 05-71140], his previous motion having been denied on December 26, 2007. A summary judgment motion is presently pending. As I stated in my previous order, it is the practice of this Court to defer any attempt to obtain counsel for pro se civil rights Plaintiffs until after motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment have been denied.

Therefore, Plaintiff's motions for the appointment of counsel are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Laster v. Pramstaller

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 25, 2009
Case No. 06-13508, 05-71140 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Laster v. Pramstaller

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN C. LASTER, Plaintiff, v. DR. GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2009

Citations

Case No. 06-13508, 05-71140 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

Spearman v. Michigan

The M.D.O.C. has a policy regarding the copying of court pleadings, whereby an inmate's prison account is…

Rutherford v. Warden, S. Ohio Corr. Facility

See, e.g., Shavers v. Bergh, No. 2:07-cv-171, 2012 WL 1377169, at *2 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2012) (Report and…