From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 21, 1934
152 Misc. 274 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

June 21, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Reuben S. Levins, for the appellant.

Fred Goldman, for the respondent.


Once a case has been settled pursuant to stipulation it is finally terminated and may not be set down for trial on motion. The defendant, respondent's remedy is not a motion to set aside the judgment entered pursuant to such settlement. He may bring suit for breach of the terms of such stipulation. ( Naegeli Furniture Co. v. Holstein, 175 N.Y.S. 779, and cases cited therein.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, CALLAHAN, FRANKENTHALER and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 21, 1934
152 Misc. 274 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

Case Details

Full title:LASALLE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY, Appellant, v. JOSEPH PAPPACE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 274 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 198

Citing Cases

Manufacturers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Hopson

Term]; Naegeli Furniture Co. v. Holstein, 175 N.Y.S. 779 [App. Term]; La Salle Ext. University v. Pappace,…

La Salle Extension University v. Parella

He may bring suit for breach of the terms of such stipulation." ( La Salle Extension University v. Pappace,…