From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building & Construction Trades Council

U.S.
Oct 12, 1982
459 U.S. 916 (1982)

Summary

finding that after proper termination of a franchise agreement continued use by defendants of a trademark constitutes a violation of Section 43 of the Lanham Act

Summary of this case from Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.

Opinion

No. 81-1798.

October 12, 1982.


C.A. 3d Cir. Motions of Center on National Labor Policy and Associated Builders Contractors, Inc., for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 670 F. 2d 421.


Summaries of

Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building & Construction Trades Council

U.S.
Oct 12, 1982
459 U.S. 916 (1982)

finding that after proper termination of a franchise agreement continued use by defendants of a trademark constitutes a violation of Section 43 of the Lanham Act

Summary of this case from Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.

discussing split in circuits on whether "likelihood of confusion" is question of fact or legal conclusion

Summary of this case from University of Ga. Athletic Ass'n v. Laite
Case details for

Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building & Construction Trades Council

Case Details

Full title:LARRY V. MUKO, INC. v. SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BUILDING CONSTRUCTION…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 12, 1982

Citations

459 U.S. 916 (1982)

Citing Cases

Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.

These courts noted that a movant may merit preliminary injunctive relief simply upon a showing of irreparable…

U-Haul International, Inc. v. Kresch

The court acknowledged an eight factor test for determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion, but…