From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Larocque v. New York Herald Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1917
115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1917)

Summary

In Joseph Larocque v. New York Herald Co. (Feb., 1917) 220 N.Y. 632, 115 N.E. 1042, an action for damages for libel based upon an article which was correct, except that the name of John Larocque was erroneously printed as "Joseph Larocque," the Court of Appeals of New York, six justices sitting, unanimously sustained a judgment for the plaintiff.

Summary of this case from Washington Post Co. v. Kennedy

Opinion

Argued January 31, 1917

Decided February 27, 1917

Robert W. Candler and John H. Bogardus for appellant.

Charles F. Brown and Roderic Wellman for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, POUND and CRANE, JJ. Not sitting: CARDOZO, J.


Summaries of

Larocque v. New York Herald Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1917
115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1917)

In Joseph Larocque v. New York Herald Co. (Feb., 1917) 220 N.Y. 632, 115 N.E. 1042, an action for damages for libel based upon an article which was correct, except that the name of John Larocque was erroneously printed as "Joseph Larocque," the Court of Appeals of New York, six justices sitting, unanimously sustained a judgment for the plaintiff.

Summary of this case from Washington Post Co. v. Kennedy
Case details for

Larocque v. New York Herald Company

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LAROCQUE, Respondent, v . NEW YORK HERALD COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1917

Citations

115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1917)
115 N.E. 1042

Citing Cases

Washington Post Co. v. Kennedy

" In Joseph Larocque v. New York Herald Co. (Feb., 1917) 220 N.Y. 632, 115 N.E. 1042, an action for damages…

Meyers v. Huschle Bros

Per Curiam. Special Term correctly struck out paragraphs X through XXVI of the answer, allowing defendant to…