From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lapique v. Dunnigan

Supreme Court of California
Sep 11, 1930
210 Cal. 281 (Cal. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 8896.

September 11, 1930.

APPEAL from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Hugh J. Crawford, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

J.L. Lapique, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Haas Dunnigan, H.E. Forster, Everrett W. Mattoon, Roy W. Dowds and Lawler Degnan for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] By the institution of this action the plaintiff sought to recover damages in the sum of one million dollars for an alleged malicious prosecution. Demurrers to the second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend, and from the several judgments thereafter entered plaintiff prosecuted this appeal. Since perfecting his appeal, the appellant has passed away. As evidence of this fact there has been filed herein a certified copy of a certificate of death, showing that appellant expired on September 24, 1927. The original certificate is on file in the office of the health officer of the city of San Rafael.

As malicious prosecution is an injury to the person, a cause of action based thereon dies with the person. (1 Cal. Jur. 71, sec. 41; 16 Cal. Jur. 743, sec. 12.) It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be, and it is hereby, dismissed.


Summaries of

Lapique v. Dunnigan

Supreme Court of California
Sep 11, 1930
210 Cal. 281 (Cal. 1930)
Case details for

Lapique v. Dunnigan

Case Details

Full title:JOHN LAPIQUE, Appellant, v. HARRY L. DUNNIGAN et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Sep 11, 1930

Citations

210 Cal. 281 (Cal. 1930)
291 P. 184

Citing Cases

Liuzza v. Bell

If appellant administrator claims that a substantial right was impaired by reason of the neglect to…