From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Langweiler v. Borough of Newtown

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3210 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3210.

December 29, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, on this 28th day of December, 2010, upon careful consideration of Defendants Borough of Newtown's, Anthony Wojciechowksi's, and Lee Matthews's Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 7), and Plaintiff Craig Langweiler's Cross-Motion to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion to Partially Dismiss is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum.
2. Plaintiff's Cross-Motion to file the Amended Complaint attached to the Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff Craig Langweiler is granted leave to file a different amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order to cure the deficiencies identified in the accompanying Memorandum.


Summaries of

Langweiler v. Borough of Newtown

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3210 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Langweiler v. Borough of Newtown

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG LANGWEILER, Plaintiff, v. THE BOROUGH OF NEWTOWN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3210 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Stokes v. City of Philadelphia

Thomas v. Cumberland Cnty., 749 F.3d 217, 223 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62…

McDonald-Witherspoon v. City of Philadelphia

"This standard is disjunctive, so the defendant's conduct need only be reckless or callous." Langweiler v.…