From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1921
109 S.E. 87 (N.C. 1921)

Opinion

(Filed 9 November, 1921.)

Railroads — Director General — War — Actions — Procedure.

An action to recover damages against a railroad company for a personal injury negligently inflicted while operated by the Director General as a war measure, will not lie, and, on appeal, will be dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiff's right of action against the Director General of Railroads.

APPEAL by defendant from Finley, J., at March Term, 1921, of GUILFORD.

John A. Barringer for plaintiff.

Wilson Frazier for defendant.


Action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff while performing the duties of a brakeman in the city of Danville, Va., on 24 March, 1919.

It appeared from the plaintiff's evidence that at the (775) time of the accident and injury complained of the plaintiff, and those in charge of the train upon which the injury occurred, were employed by and working for the Director General of Railroads under the United States Railroad Administration.

The Director General has not been made a party to this action, and the Southern Railway Company is the only defendant.

There was a motion to dismiss upon the ground that the Federal Control Act (1920) did not impose any liability upon the defendant on any cause of action arising out of the operation of its system of transportation by the United States Government; and that, therefore, a suit for such an injury could not be maintained as against it. This motion was overruled; and upon the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages being answered by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment rendered thereon, the defendant Southern Railway Company appealed.


Upon authority of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Mo. Pac. R. R. Co. v. Ault, decided 1 June, 1921 (since the case at bar was tried in the Superior Court), and reported in the Advanced Opinions of that Court, at page 647, No. 16, 1 July, 1921, the present action will be dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff to proceed hereafter against the Director General of Railroads.

Action dismissed.


Summaries of

Lane v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1921
109 S.E. 87 (N.C. 1921)
Case details for

Lane v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:E. L. LANE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1921

Citations

109 S.E. 87 (N.C. 1921)
182 N.C. 774

Citing Cases

North Carolina R.R. v. Lee

The Ault Case holds that the Director General alone was made subject, by § 10 of the Federal Control Act, to…