From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lane v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1879
59 N.H. 80 (N.H. 1879)

Opinion

Decided June, 1879.

A bankrupt defendant may be allowed to defend a suit when the assignee refuses to assume the control of the defendant's interest in it.

ASSUMPSIT, for materials furnished to build a livery stable. Attachment to secure statute lien. At the return term the bankruptcy of the defendant was suggested, and the action continued. At the next term it was shown that the assignee refused to appear. The defendant thereupon moved for leave to defend the suit. The court denied the motion, and ordered judgment in rem, to which the defendant excepted.

Whittemore, for the plaintiffs.

A. F. L. Norris, for the defendant.


As a bankrupt plaintiff may be allowed to maintain a suit which his assignee refuses to prosecute or dispose of (Towle Davenport, 57 N.H. 149; Towle v. Rowe, 58 N.H. 394; Ramsey v. Fellows, 58 N.H. 607), so a bankrupt defendant may be allowed to defend a suit when the assignee refuses to assume the control of the defendant's interest in it. The defendant's attached property, abandoned by the assignee, is still, for some purposes, the property of the defendant. If there is an attachment not dissolved by the assignment, the defendant may have an interest in the suit. Whether he has an interest which justice requires he should be allowed to protect by contesting the suit, is a question to be determined at the trial term. A continuance of the action to await the result of the proceedings in bankruptcy does not appear to be necessary.

Case discharged.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Lane v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1879
59 N.H. 80 (N.H. 1879)
Case details for

Lane v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:LANE a. v. MOORE

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Jun 1, 1879

Citations

59 N.H. 80 (N.H. 1879)

Citing Cases

Harvey v. Watson

The assignment and all pertinent laws of New York are made part of the case. Wm. H. Drury and Frink…

English v. Richardson

In re Scruggs, supra, 677; Rosenblum v. Uber, 256 Fed. Rep. 584, 588, 589; In re Ells, 98 Fed. Rep. 967, 968;…