From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landrum v. Carey, Warden

U.S.
Jan 10, 2005
543 U.S. 1067 (2005)

Summary

In Landrum v. Carey, 185 Ga. 76 (194 S.E. 362), this court held that where land of a married man was duly set apart under the constitution and laws as a homestead, the homestead did not divest the husband of legal title, and that after such exemption the man could sell and convey legal title, with right of possession postponed until termination of the homestead exemption.

Summary of this case from Dorsey v. Dorsey

Opinion

No. 04-7090.

January 10, 2005.


C.A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 806. Certiorari Denied.


Summaries of

Landrum v. Carey, Warden

U.S.
Jan 10, 2005
543 U.S. 1067 (2005)

In Landrum v. Carey, 185 Ga. 76 (194 S.E. 362), this court held that where land of a married man was duly set apart under the constitution and laws as a homestead, the homestead did not divest the husband of legal title, and that after such exemption the man could sell and convey legal title, with right of possession postponed until termination of the homestead exemption.

Summary of this case from Dorsey v. Dorsey
Case details for

Landrum v. Carey, Warden

Case Details

Full title:LANDRUM v. CAREY, WARDEN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 10, 2005

Citations

543 U.S. 1067 (2005)
125 S. Ct. 900

Citing Cases

Fraser v. Martin

o her subject to and not in satisfaction of the security deed. Her act in undertaking to bring the property…

Dorsey v. Dorsey

In Denson v. Keys, 140 Ga. 134 ( 78 S.E. 768), this question was presented and the distinction between the…