From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Landrigan v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 14, 2005
397 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 00-99011.

February 14, 2005.

Dale A. Baich, Federal Public Defenders Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kent E. Cattani, Office of the Attorney General Civil Division, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Silverman was recused.


Summaries of

Landrigan v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 14, 2005
397 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Landrigan v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey Timothy LANDRIGAN, a.k.a. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 14, 2005

Citations

397 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Schriro v. Landrigan

The District Court determined, after "expand[ing] the record to include . . . evidence of [Landrigan's]…

Schriro v. Landrigan

Because Landrigan could not make out even a "colorable" ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, id., at…