From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamet v. Miller

Supreme Court of California
Feb 17, 1886
68 Cal. 521 (Cal. 1886)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County.

         Motion to dismiss appeal.

         COUNSEL:

         Ed. M. Martin, for Appellants.

          Grove L. Johnson, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: McKee, J. Ross, J., and McKinstry, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          McKEE, Judge

         On the 4th of August, 1885, respondent's attorney served on the attorney of appellants notice that he would, on the 15th of August, move to dismiss the appeal taken in this case, on the ground that no transcript had been filed within the time prescribed by the rules of the court.

         After service appellants' attorney filed the transcript before the day noticed for the hearing of the motion. Respondent's attorney knew of the filing of the transcript on the day it was filed, and he did not bring on his motion for hearing on the day for which it was noticed, or at any other time during the session of the court. There was no stipulation by the attorneys to postpone the hearing of the motion, and no order by the court continuing it to a future time; but in the month of October respondent's attorney served appellant with notice that he would, on the 3d of November, 1885, bring to a hearing the motion to dismiss the appeal, which had been noticed for the 15th of August.

         A motion to dismiss an appeal should be made on the day noticed for the hearing, or at the first opportunity during the session of the court. If not so made the motion lapses, and it cannot be revived at a subsequent session. Motion denied.


Summaries of

Lamet v. Miller

Supreme Court of California
Feb 17, 1886
68 Cal. 521 (Cal. 1886)
Case details for

Lamet v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE LAMET, Respondent, v. CHARLES MILLER et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 17, 1886

Citations

68 Cal. 521 (Cal. 1886)
9 P. 669

Citing Cases

Eads v. Clarke

"          We are of opinion that the certified copy of the order in evidence in the case in hand was…