Opinion
Argued October 20, 1927 —
Decided December 23, 1927.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 103 N.J.L. 23.
The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.
For the appellant, Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney general.
For the respondent, Martin P. Devlin.
The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.
For affirmance — KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 6.
For reversal — PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, HETFIELD, JJ. 6.