From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lambert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 30, 1964
338 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1964)

Opinion

Nos. 79-81, Dockets 28983-28985.

Argued October 20, 1964.

Decided October 30, 1964.

Raymond F. Garrity, Washington, D.C. (Garrity, Ferguson Phillipps, Carl A. Phillipps, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioners.

Edward B. Greensfelder, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and David O. Walter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C.), for respondent.

Edward Pesin, Newark, N.J., for S. Arthur Stern, filed a brief as amicus curiae.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


We affirm the judgment of the Tax Court on the opinion of Judge Fay. Although the Commissioner might well have taken a more lenient view on the facts here presented, it is plain that the petitioners did not comply with requirements on which the Commissioner was entitled to insist.


Summaries of

Lambert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 30, 1964
338 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Lambert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Ralph D. LAMBERT and Margot Lambert, Ernest J. Henley and Barbara M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 30, 1964

Citations

338 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Standard Oil Company v. United States

We have been informed — and Standard has not taken issue — that the understanding of both taxpayers and the…

Bailey v. United States

However, when their 1953 returns were being prepared, they discovered that a tax-free liquidation had not…