Affirming the trial court and discussing that court's interpretation of a local District Court rule, finding no prejudicial error based on the denial of oral argument in a summary judgment motion because the party "had the opportunity to apprise the district court of any arguments it believed supported its position. . . ."
Summary of this case from Waltner v. U.S.No. 91-1192.
March 9, 1992.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 933 F. 2d 724.
Affirming the trial court and discussing that court's interpretation of a local District Court rule, finding no prejudicial error based on the denial of oral argument in a summary judgment motion because the party "had the opportunity to apprise the district court of any arguments it believed supported its position. . . ."
Summary of this case from Waltner v. U.S.noting the "considerable confusion" over whether to apply the O'Brien analysis or the Renton analysis, but concluding that Renton applied where the regulation was similar to that found in Renton, and in any event, that "the answer should be the same regardless of which analysis is used"
Summary of this case from Greenville County v. Kenwood Enterprises, Inc.Full title:LAKE AT LAS VEGAS INVESTORS GROUP, INC. v. TRANSCONTINENTAL CORP. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 9, 1992
Plaintiffs further argue that there is no evidence of secondary effects occurring at 2312 West Farwell Drive.…
Sammy's of Mobile, Ltd. v. City of MobileUnlike the statute upheld in Barnes, which focused on nudity simpliciter and not on forms of expressive…