From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laita v. Laita

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1940
306 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,035. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed June 26, 1940

DIVORCE, § 185modification, jurisdiction within 30 days. Where plaintiff had secured divorce decree and had consented to incorporation of contract concerning alimony, attorney's fees, dower, homestead and property rights, upon petition to modify decree on ground that it was fraudulently induced by defendant and plaintiff's attorney court had jurisdiction because petition was filed 27 days after decree and court still had control of it, and petition was improperly dismissed by trial court on theory that decree could only be attacked by original bill in equity in nature of bill of review.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Superior Court of Cook county; Hon. ROBERT C. O'CONNELL, presiding.

Decree reversed and cause remanded for a new trial of plaintiff's petition. Heard in second division, first district, this court at December term, 1939.

Teed, Kammermann Johnson, for appellant;

Hugh E. Johnson and Clarence Kammermann, of counsel;

Albert C. Boehm, for appellee;

Albert C. Boehm and Raymond R. Stern, of counsel.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed June 26, 1940.


Summaries of

Laita v. Laita

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Jun 26, 1940
306 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
Case details for

Laita v. Laita

Case Details

Full title:Sophia Y. Laita, Appellant, v. Walter Laita, Appellee

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Jun 26, 1940

Citations

306 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
28 N.E.2d 299

Citing Cases

James v. James

(Ill. Rev. Stat. 1957, chap. 110, par. 50(6).) Appellant's motion, therefore, was made while the trial court…