From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lagarde v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 30, 2001
No. 01 Civ. 3224 (LTS)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2001)

Summary

blocking assets of persons determined "to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten" national security

Summary of this case from Fulmen Co. v. Office of Foreign Assets Control

Opinion

No. 01 Civ. 3224 (LTS)(DCF)

April 30, 2001


PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL ORDER


1. It is hereby ORDERED that a pre-trial conference shall be held in the above-captioned matter on August 3, 2001 at 11:15 a.m. in Courtroom No. 444, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. It is further

2. ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff(s) shall serve a copy of this Preliminary Pre-Trial Order on each defendant within ten (10) calendar days following the date of this order, and that a copy of this Preliminary Pre-Trial Order shall also be served with any subsequent process that brings in additional parties, and that proof of such service shall be filed with the Court promptly. It is further

As used in this Order, the term "counsel" shall, in the case of an individual party who is proceeding Pro-se, mean such party.

3. ORDERED that counsel for the parties confer preliminarily at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the date set forth in paragraph 1 above to discuss the following matters:

a. Facts that are not disputed and facts that are in dispute.

b. Contested and uncontested legal issues.

c. The disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1).

d. Anticipated amendments to the pleadings, and an appropriate deadline therefor.

e. Settlement.

f. Whether mediation might facilitate resolution of the case.

g. Whether the case is to be tried to a jury.

h. Whether each party consents to trial of the case by a magistrate judge.
i. Anticipated discovery and an appropriate deadline for the conclusion of discovery.
j. Whether expert witness evidence will be required, and appropriate deadlines for expert witness discovery.
k. Whether dispositive motions may be appropriate, and a deadline for such motions.
l. Evidence to be presented at trial and the length of time expected to be required for the presentation of evidence at trial.

It is further

4. ORDERED that counsel for all parties shall confer and shall prepare, execute and file with the Court no later than seven (7) calendar days before the date set forth in paragraph 1 above a single document captioned PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL STATEMENT, which shall be signed by all counsel, which shall set forth the following information, and which shall constitute the written report required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f):

a. A concise statement of the nature of this action.

b. A concise statement of each party's position as to the basis of this Court's jurisdiction of the action, with citations to all statutes relied upon and relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional amount.
c. A concise statement of all material uncontested or admitted facts.

d. A concise statement of all uncontested legal issues.

e. A concise statement of all legal issues to be decided by the Court.
f. Each party's concise statement of material disputed facts.
g. A concise statement by each plaintiff and each counterclaimant of the legal basis of each cause of action asserted, including citations to all statutes, Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, other rules and case law intended to be relied upon by such plaintiff or counterclaimant.
h. Each party's concise statement of the legal basis of each defense asserted or expected to be asserted by such party, including citations to all statutes, Rules, and other applicable regulatory and judicial authority intended to be relied on by such party.
i. A concise statement of the measure of proof and on whom the burden of proof falls as to each cause of action or defense.
j. Whether and to what extent amendments to pleadings and/or the addition or substitution of parties will be required, and proposed deadlines therefor.
k. A statement as to whether all parties consent to trial of the case by a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so consented).
l. What, if any, changes should be made in the timing, form or requirements for disclosures under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a), including a statement as to when any disclosures required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) were made or will be made.
m. The subjects on which disclosure may be needed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focus upon particular issues, including a concise description of each party's plan for discovery and a proposed discovery cut-off date.
n. Whether and to what extent expert evidence will be required, and proposed deadlines for expert discovery.
o. What, if any, changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of court, and what other limitations should be imposed.
p. The status of settlement discussions and the prospects for settlement of the action in whole or in part, provided that the Preliminary Pre-Trial Statement shall not disclose to the Court specific settlement offers or demands.
q. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or without a jury, and the number of trial days expected to be needed for presentation of that party's case.
r. Any other orders that should be entered by the Court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and (c).

It is further

5. ORDERED that counsel shall be prepared to discuss the foregoing at the pre-trial conference, as well as whether mediation may be helpful in resolving this case, and anticipated dispositive motions and a deadline therefor. It is further

6. ORDERED that counsel attending the pre-trial conference shall seek settlement authority from their respective clients prior to such conference. If counsel is not granted such authority, the client must be present in person or available by telephone so that a settlement can be consummated if possible. "Settlement authority," as used herein, includes the power to enter into stipulations and make admissions regarding all matters that the participants may reasonably anticipate discussing at the pre-trial conference including, but not limited to, the matters enumerated in the preceding paragraphs.

7. In the event that any party fails to comply with this Order, the Court may impose sanctions or take other action as appropriate. Such sanctions and action may include assessing costs and attorneys' fees, precluding evidence or defenses, dismissing the action, and/or the imposition of other appropriate penalties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lagarde v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 30, 2001
No. 01 Civ. 3224 (LTS)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2001)

blocking assets of persons determined "to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten" national security

Summary of this case from Fulmen Co. v. Office of Foreign Assets Control

Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism

Summary of this case from Estate of Heiser v. Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ
Case details for

Lagarde v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Thomas LaGarde, Plaintiff(s), v. The City of New York; John Does 1 through…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 30, 2001

Citations

No. 01 Civ. 3224 (LTS)(DCF) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 30, 2001)

Citing Cases

Humanitarian Law Project v. U. S. Treas

On September 23, 2001, President George W. Bush invoked his authority under the Constitution, IEEPA, and…

Global Relief Foundation Inc. v. O'Neill

On September 24, 2001, President George W. Bush declared a national emergency with respect to the "grave acts…