From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaFluer v. Hollier

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jan 31, 1986
478 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-287.

November 27, 1985. Writ Granted January 31, 1986.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE ROBERT BRINKMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING.

Edwards, Stefanski Barousser, James M. Cunningham, III, Crowley, Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier McElligott, Richard Meaux, Lafayette, for defendants-appellants.

John Haas Weinstein, Opelousas, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before DOMENGEAUX, DOUCET and KING, JJ.


For the reasons assigned in the case of Larry Fontenot v. F. Hollier Sons, 478 So.2d 1379 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1985), the trial court judgment is affirmed.

All costs of this appeal are assessed to defendants-appellants.

AFFIRMED.

DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in No. 84-288, handed down this date.


I concur, See my concurring opinion in No. 84-288, Fontenot v. Hollier, et al., handed down this date.


Summaries of

LaFluer v. Hollier

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jan 31, 1986
478 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

LaFluer v. Hollier

Case Details

Full title:ARLEN LAFLEUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. F. HOLLIER SONS, ET AL.…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 1986

Citations

478 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Robert v. Bayou Bernard Marine, Inc.

The Supreme Court has recently stated that the rule today is that nonpecuniary loss may not be recovered in a…

Richards v. Cousins

In support of their contention plaintiffs cite the case of Fontenot v. F. Hollier Sons, Inc., 478 So.2d 1379…