From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LaFleur v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1995
221 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


Defendant's liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) was established as a matter of law since defendant breached its nondelegable duty to provide adequate safety devices to prevent plaintiff's fall from a ladder upon which he was working ( see, Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 N.Y.2d 555, 561-562). The fact that the ladder was provided by another party does not relieve defendant from liability. The failure to provide adequate safety devices was a substantial cause of plaintiff's fall and resulting injuries which were foreseeable in light of such risk ( see, supra). That the ladder was knocked over by a cabinet which collapsed when the plaintiff touched it with his hand was not such an extraordinary event as to constitute a superseding cause ( see, supra; Robinson v NAB Constr. Corp., 210 A.D.2d 86; Quinlan v Eastern Refractories Co., 217 A.D.2d 819).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

LaFleur v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1995
221 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

LaFleur v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RANDY LaFLEUR, Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 496

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Chase Manhattan Bank

On this record, they were properly granted a directed verdict. Given the nature of the work, an object…

Riffo-Velozo v. Village of Scarsdale

iled to raise a triable issue of fact. "The defendant[s] did not offer any evidence, other than mere…