From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laduke Estate v. Laduke

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jun 7, 1966
220 A.2d 474 (Vt. 1966)

Opinion

Opinion Filed June 7, 1966

Appeal and Error. Foreclosure.

1. Supreme Court is without authority to entertain a purported appeal from a decree of foreclosure where permission from the court below to take the appeal, as required by 12 V.S.A. § 4601, does not appear in the record.

Foreclosure proceeding with respect to real estate mortgage. In Chancery, Rutland County, September 1965 Term, Daley, Chancellor. Permission to appeal did not appear on the record as required by 12 V.S.A. § 4601. Dismissed.

Frank L. Bunting for appellant.

O'Neill, Delaney Valente for appellee.

April Term, 1966

Present: Holden, C.J., Shangraw, Barney, Smith and Keyser, JJ.


This is a purported appeal from a decree of foreclosure of a Mortgage decreed by the Rutland County Court of Chancery on January 2, 1966. No permission from the court below to take the appeal here appears in the record before us as required by 12 V.S.A. § 4601. We are without authority to entertain the appeal. See Factory Point Bank v. Equinox Co., 110 Vt. 277, 279, 5 A.2d 462. The entry is "Appeal Dismissed."


Summaries of

Laduke Estate v. Laduke

Supreme Court of Vermont
Jun 7, 1966
220 A.2d 474 (Vt. 1966)
Case details for

Laduke Estate v. Laduke

Case Details

Full title:Robert A. Webster, Ex. Estate of Frank Z. LaDuke v. Catherine F. LaDuke

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Jun 7, 1966

Citations

220 A.2d 474 (Vt. 1966)
220 A.2d 474

Citing Cases

Vermont National Bank v. Clark

In that case defendants did not seek or obtain permission to appeal under § 4601, and that procedural failure…

State v. Mahoney

The first is to obtain recorded permission from the court concerned to bring up to this Court the questions…