From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacock v. City of Schenectady

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 433 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1929

Decided July 11, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Chatfield T. Bates for appellant.

Carleton H. Lewis, Corporation Counsel ( Charles G. Fryer of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

Lacock v. City of Schenectady

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 433 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

Lacock v. City of Schenectady

Case Details

Full title:CECELIA B. LACOCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN R. LACOCK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1929

Citations

168 N.E. 433 (N.Y. 1929)
168 N.E. 433

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Incorporated Village of Farmingdale

The enactment by the Legislature of former section 282-e High. of the Highway Law (now Vehicle and Traffic…

Miller v. City of New York

The City thus comes within the letter of section 59 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, and we see no…