From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Page v. Di Costanzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 1993
194 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 17, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Franklin County (Plumadore, J.).


On the evening of February 9, 1989, Reuven Levy was called in by defendant Lynne Di Costanzo, to assist in a Caesarean section delivery of a full-term fetus carried by plaintiff Theresa A. La Page. By the time it was delivered, however, the baby was already dead. La Page and the baby's father thereafter commenced this action against defendants alleging one cause of action for wrongful death on the baby's behalf and a second cause of action by La Page alone for her claimed damages arising out of defendants' actions. Following joinder of issue, all defendants separately moved for summary judgment requesting, inter alia, that the wrongful death action be dismissed on the basis that New York does not recognize a wrongful death cause of action for a stillborn child. Although in opposition to these motions plaintiffs initially argued that their baby was born alive, it was ultimately conceded that the baby was stillborn and plaintiffs instead argued for a modification of the current law. Supreme Court thereafter dismissed the wrongful death cause of action and this appeal by plaintiffs ensued.

We affirm. Plaintiffs do not dispute the fact that the law in New York is that no wrongful death cause of action exists on behalf of a stillborn fetus (see, Endresz v. Friedberg, 24 N.Y.2d 478, 482-487; see also, Tebbutt v. Virostek, 65 N.Y.2d 931, 933; Raymond v. Bartsch, 84 A.D.2d 60, lv denied 56 N.Y.2d 508). While plaintiffs raise several interesting arguments in support of their claim that the law should be changed, this Court has stated before that reconsideration of the law established in Endresz v Friedberg (supra) "must be addressed to the Legislature or the Court of Appeals" (Raymond v. Bartsch, supra, at 62). Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the wrongful death cause of action was inappropriately dismissed (see, Indilicato v. Bellevue Maternity Hosp., 108 A.D.2d 997).

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

La Page v. Di Costanzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 17, 1993
194 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

La Page v. Di Costanzo

Case Details

Full title:THERESA A. LA PAGE, Individually and as Natural Parent and Limited…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

Politis v. Pritzker

The plaintiffs' first, second, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, ninth, and eleventh causes of action are…

Matter of Broadnax

The petitioners sought limited letters of administration in the Surrogate's Court for the purpose of…