From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De La Cruz v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 31, 2017
No. CIV-16-304-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 31, 2017)

Opinion

No. CIV-16-304-C

01-31-2017

LUIS DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. JOHN B. FOX, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Goodwin entered a Report and Recommendation on December 22, 2016, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his objection, Petitioner raises no issue of fact or law not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 23), and for the reasons announced therein, this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motion is stricken as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2017.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

De La Cruz v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 31, 2017
No. CIV-16-304-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 31, 2017)
Case details for

De La Cruz v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:LUIS DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. JOHN B. FOX, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jan 31, 2017

Citations

No. CIV-16-304-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

Cruz v. United States

See Post-Hr'g Mem. in Opp. at 5 (citing In re Frank, 690 Fed. App'x 146 (Mem.) (5th Cir. 2017); La Cruz v.…