From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall

U.S.
Nov 3, 1890
137 U.S. 61 (1890)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 11.

Argued and submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890.

In a petition for the removal of a cause from a State court on the ground of diverse citizenship, the failure to state the existence of such citizenship at the commencement of the suit as well as when the removal was asked is a fatal defect.

Mr. Charles B. Alexander (with whom was Mr. John J. McCook on the brief) for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Given Campbell for defendant in error.


THE case is stated in the opinion.


This action was commenced by plaintiff in error in a State court, and removed to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri upon petition of the defendant, on the ground that the plaintiff was an alien and citizen of France and the defendant a citizen of Missouri. The existence of such diverse citizenship at the commencement of the suit, as well as when the removal was asked, did not appear affirmatively in the petition for removal or in the record when that was filed.

We are compelled to reverse the judgment, with costs, and remit the cause to the Circuit Court, with a direction to remand to the State Court. Stevens v. Nichols, 130 U.S. 230; Crehore v. Ohio and Mississippi Railway Co., 131 U.S. 240; Jackson v. Allen, 132 U.S. 27.

Reversed and ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall

U.S.
Nov 3, 1890
137 U.S. 61 (1890)
Case details for

La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:LA CONFIANCE COMPAGNIE ANONYME D'ASSURANCE v . HALL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 3, 1890

Citations

137 U.S. 61 (1890)

Citing Cases

Kellam v. Keith

Argued and submitted April 1, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892.On the authority of Stevens v. Nichols, 130 U.S.…

Yarbrough v. Blake

"But where the essential facts necessary to justify removal are not alleged, either perfectly or imperfectly,…