From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kyle v. Lindsay

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 10, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-0948 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-0948.

October 10, 2008


ORDER


NOW, THIS 10th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008, having carefully considered the August 12, 2008 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion, proposing denial of the habeas corpus petition challenging an adverse parole decision; and

observing that Petitioner has not objected to the proposed disposition of this matter; and

finding that review may properly be limited to determining whether the Report and Recommendation contains clear error that not only affects the outcome of this proceeding, but also substantially adversely affects the integrity, fairness and public reputation of official proceedings, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F.Supp. 375, 377 M.D. Pa. 1998); and

discerning no such error in Magistrate Judge Mannion's thorough analysis, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mannion (Dkt. Entry 19) is ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.


Summaries of

Kyle v. Lindsay

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 10, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-0948 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Kyle v. Lindsay

Case Details

Full title:WILLIS KYLE, JR., Petitioner v. CAMERON LINDSAY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 10, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-0948 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Calhoun v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States does not apply to…