From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kurtz v. Oremland

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 22, 1954
16 N.J. 454 (N.J. 1954)

Opinion

Argued November 8 and 15, 1954 —

Decided November 22, 1954.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Greene Hellring, attorneys).

Mr. David M. Perskie, Mr. William Elmer Brown, Jr., and Mr. Carl Kisselman argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Perskie and Perskie, and Messrs. Brown and Frank, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J. Super. 443 ( Ch. Div. 1954).

For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN — 3.


Summaries of

Kurtz v. Oremland

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 22, 1954
16 N.J. 454 (N.J. 1954)
Case details for

Kurtz v. Oremland

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH KURTZ AND DAVID BUSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BENJAMIN OREMLAND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 22, 1954

Citations

16 N.J. 454 (N.J. 1954)
109 A.2d 286

Citing Cases

Sgro v. Getty Petroleum Corp.

Each of the parties bears the burden of proving their respective claims. See Michael Halebian N.J., Inc. v.…

Tynan v. General Motors Corp.

Moreover, a conspiracy is not actionable absent an independent wrong. See Kurtz v. Oremland, 33 N.J. Super.…