From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kursa v. Overseas Shipping Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

June, 1926.


Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. As to maritime torts, the general right of action for injuries resulting in death remains what it was before the passage of the Workmen's Compensation Law. ( Warren v. Morse Dry Dock Repair Co., 235 N.Y. 445, 447.) It is immaterial whether these workmen's compensation laws are elective or compulsory. Neither can displace the admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal courts or the common-law jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the State. ( Christensen v. Morse Dry Dock Repair Co., 216 App. Div. 274.) The New Jersey Death Statute, like the New York statute, gives a right of action for damages for a "wrongful act, neglect or default," which causes death. The governing principle is the locus injuriae. One mortally injured on navigable waters leaves behind a right of action in favor of his survivors notwithstanding he was permitted to die on land. ( The Chiswick, 231 Fed. 452; The Anglo-Patagonian, 235 id. 92.) Rich, Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

See New Jersey Laws of 1848, p. 151, as amd. by New Jersey Laws of 1913, p. 586, chap. 287; New Jersey Laws of 1917, p. 531, chap. 180; 2 Comp. Stat. N.J. 1907, § 7; Id. 1908, § 8; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. N.J. (1911-1924), 927, § 55-8; Id. 928, § 55-10; Decedent Estate Law, § 130 et seq., as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 919. — [REP.


Summaries of

Kursa v. Overseas Shipping Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Kursa v. Overseas Shipping Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIA KURSA and WILLIAM HORMAN, Administrators, etc., of MATWAY KURSA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1926

Citations

217 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Resigno v. Jarka Co., Inc.

What it attempted was "not to abolish every remedy, but to substitute one remedy for another" ( Warren v.…

Resigno v. Jarka Co., Inc.

The Strabo, 98 Fed. 998, 39 C.C.A. 375; The Aurora (D.C.) 163 Fed. 634.'" To the same effect is Kursa v.…