From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kunkel Estate v. County of Dauphin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 18, 1976
364 A.2d 959 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1976)

Summary

In Kunkel Estate v. County of Dauphin, 26 Pa. Commw. 587, 364 A.2d 959 (1976), the grant of either a remittur or a new trial on a post-trial motion was affirmed.

Summary of this case from Water Sewer Authority v. Rawlings

Opinion

Argued September 14, 1976

October 18, 1976.

Argued September 14, 1976, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., WILKINSON, JR., and ROGERS, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 196 C.D. 1976, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County in case of Estate of John C. Kunkel, deceased v. County of Dauphin, No. 1268 June Term, 1974.

Declaration of taking filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. Viewers appointed. Award filed. Condemnee appealed. Verdict rendered. Motion for new trial filed by condemnor. Remittitur or new trial ordered. LIPSITT, J. Condemnee appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

Donn L. Snyder, with him Berman, Boswell, Snyder Tintner, for appellant.

Robert L. Knupp, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.


The present appeal concerns the propriety of the trial judge's order directing the Estate of John C. Kunkel, Appellant, to file a remittitur or suffer the granting of the County of Dauphin's, Appellee, motion for a new trial.

This controversy arose when Appellee filed a Declaration of Taking involving, inter alia, land owned by Appellant. Appellant, dissatisfied with the award of the Board of View, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. After expert testimony from both sides, the court, jury and counsel viewed the property. The jury then rendered a verdict in favor of Appellant in the amount of $63,000.00. After a motion for a new trial was filed by Appellee, the trial judge ordered a remittitur or a new trial. Judge LIPSITT has most ably presented both the facts and the law in his opinion below, and for these reasons, we adopt his opinion, which can be found at: 98 Dauphin 71 (1976).

Affirmed.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 1976, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Kunkel Estate v. County of Dauphin

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 18, 1976
364 A.2d 959 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1976)

In Kunkel Estate v. County of Dauphin, 26 Pa. Commw. 587, 364 A.2d 959 (1976), the grant of either a remittur or a new trial on a post-trial motion was affirmed.

Summary of this case from Water Sewer Authority v. Rawlings
Case details for

Kunkel Estate v. County of Dauphin

Case Details

Full title:Estate of John C. Kunkel, Deceased v. County of Dauphin. Estate of John C…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 18, 1976

Citations

364 A.2d 959 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1976)
364 A.2d 959

Citing Cases

Water Sewer Authority v. Rawlings

The Gentzel Corp. v. Borough of State College, 13 Pa. Commw. 116, 318 A.2d 415 (1974). In Kunkel Estate v.…