From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krzykalski v. Tindall

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 29, 2017
164 A.3d 412 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

03-29-2017

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Todd DORN, Defendant–Petitioner.


To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-006189-12 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a map identifying areas within 500 feet of public parks and buildings; and 2) whether defendant's right to a grand jury indictment was violated when the trial court permitted the prosecutor to amend the indictment to expose defendant to greater criminal liability; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 30, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant's supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before July 14, 2017.


Summaries of

Krzykalski v. Tindall

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 29, 2017
164 A.3d 412 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

Krzykalski v. Tindall

Case Details

Full title:Mark R. KRZYKALSKI, Plaintiff–Petitioner, and Michele Krzykalski…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

164 A.3d 412 (N.J. 2017)
229 N.J. 622