considering removal "not authorized by law" defective, within the meaning of 28 U.S. § 1447[c]
Summary of this case from XIAO v. CITY OF NEW YORKNo. 96-1236.
May 12, 1997, OCTOBER TERM, 1996.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 F. 3d 1537.
considering removal "not authorized by law" defective, within the meaning of 28 U.S. § 1447[c]
Summary of this case from XIAO v. CITY OF NEW YORKFull title:KRYGOSKI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 12, 1997
We first discuss this precedent, which provides that a court must evaluate whether a Federal government…
XIAO v. CITY OF NEW YORKAccordingly, Xiao's notice of removal is procedurally improper. See Hamilton, 5 F.3d at 644 (treating a…