From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krupicki v. Eagle One, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 3, 2014
Case No. 4:12-cv-00150 KGB (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2014)

Summary

finding plaintiff's responsibility to provide own truck or van and specialty tools weighed in favor of plaintiff being an independent contractor

Summary of this case from Roeder v. Directv, Inc.

Opinion

Case No. 4:12-cv-00150 KGB

04-03-2014

STANLEY KRUPICKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFF v. EAGLE ONE, INC., a/k/a EAGLEONE LOGISTICS, a/k/a PRINT N' MAIL DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Stanley Krupicki's Fair Labor Standards Act claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Mr. Krupicki's state law Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and unjust enrichment claims, dismissing without prejudice those claims.

_______________

KRISTINE G. BAKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Krupicki v. Eagle One, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 3, 2014
Case No. 4:12-cv-00150 KGB (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2014)

finding plaintiff's responsibility to provide own truck or van and specialty tools weighed in favor of plaintiff being an independent contractor

Summary of this case from Roeder v. Directv, Inc.

In Krupicki, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46038, at *15-18, the court relied on the worker's purchase of a 2003 Chevrolet Express Van and lease of a Bush Truck to conclude that his investments weighed in favor of independent contractor status.

Summary of this case from Roeder v. Directv, Inc.
Case details for

Krupicki v. Eagle One, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY KRUPICKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:12-cv-00150 KGB (E.D. Ark. Apr. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Express Courier Int'l, Inc.

(6) the extent to which the work is an integral part of the alleged employer's business.Krupicki v. Eagle…

Roslov v. Directv Inc.

In contrast, allegations that the plaintiff was actually a company's employee rather than an independent…