From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krug v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 26, 1923
144 N.E. 611 (Ohio 1923)

Opinion

No. 18180

Decided December 26, 1923.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

Mr. W.S. Rhotehamel and Mr. I.L. Jacobson, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. John Dineen, for defendant in error.


It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., WANAMAKER, ROBINSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krug v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 26, 1923
144 N.E. 611 (Ohio 1923)
Case details for

Krug v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:KRUG ET AL. v. ROBERTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 26, 1923

Citations

144 N.E. 611 (Ohio 1923)
144 N.E. 611

Citing Cases

Wilkes Associates v. Hollander Industries Corporation

It is beyond cavil that the assets of a dissolved corporation are regarded as a trust fund from which claims…

Kesselring Ford, Inc. v. Cann

It is beyond cavil that the assets of a dissolved corporation are regarded as a trust fund from which claims…