From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krowicki v. Sayemour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 28, 2017
6:16-cv-1186 (DNH/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2017)

Opinion

6:16-cv-1186 (DNH/ATB)

06-28-2017

JUSTYN KROWICKI and ALLISON BAUM, Plaintiffs, v. TIMOTHY SAYEMOUR, Commissioner of DSS/CPS; JACKIE ASNOE, HCDSS Attorney; COLLETTE FREDRICKS, CPS Worker; and KATHY LYNDECKER, Case Worker, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: JUSTYN KROWICKI ALLISON BAUM Plaintiffs pro se 111 Park Ave Apt. 1 Herkimer, New York 13350


APPEARANCES: JUSTYN KROWICKI
ALLISON BAUM
Plaintiffs pro se
111 Park Ave
Apt. 1
Herkimer, New York 13350 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiffs Justyn Krowicki and Allison Baum brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 5, 2016, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed with prejudice as to any HIPPA claims and as to any Fourth Amendment claims brought by the named plaintiffs. Magistrate Judge Baxter further recommended that the remainder of the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that plaintiffs be afforded an opportunity to file a proposed amended complaint for review. Though premature and prior to the adoption or rejection of the Report-Recommendation by the undersigned, plaintiffs filed a proposed amended complaint.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In accordance with the same, this matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Baxter for review of plaintiffs' proposed amended complaint.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiffs' HIPPA claims and Fourth Amendment claims are DISMISSED with prejudice;

2. The remainder of plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The file is referred back to Magistrate Judge Baxter for review of plaintiffs' proposed amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge Dated: June 28, 2017

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Krowicki v. Sayemour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 28, 2017
6:16-cv-1186 (DNH/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Krowicki v. Sayemour

Case Details

Full title:JUSTYN KROWICKI and ALLISON BAUM, Plaintiffs, v. TIMOTHY SAYEMOUR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

6:16-cv-1186 (DNH/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Cholakis

The Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not apply when the state court had not entered a final custody order because…