From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kriegler v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 1985
108 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 28, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Blyn, J.).


The comprehensive dishonesty, disappearance and destruction policy is clearly an indemnity policy, basically providing coverage against employee dishonesty, and the benefits of which run only to the Pressmen's Union and certain specified affiliates, none of whom is a plaintiff herein. It is not a liability policy. Nor does the policy obligate the insurer to provide a defense in connection with any legal proceeding brought against an insured. Thus, defendant Aetna Casualty was entitled to a dismissal of the complaint and declaration in its favor as to that particular policy. As to the pension and welfare fund fiduciary responsibility policy, which is a liability policy, we agree that dismissal of the complaint under either CPLR 3211 (a) (1) or (7) is inappropriate at this time since, at the very least, an issue of fact is presented concerning plaintiffs' status as employees of the Pressmen's Union and the Fund in the Federal litigation. Nor can we find, as a matter of law, that any of the exclusions apply.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Asch and Fein, JJ.


Summaries of

Kriegler v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 1985
108 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Kriegler v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE S. KRIEGLER et al., Respondents, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. County Asphalt, Inc.

As a result, the Court will refer to the more complete copy of the policy contained in County Asphalt's…

Topliffe v. US Art Co.

In the event that it is determined that the "mysterious disappearance" exclusion does not apply, Underwriters…