From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krejci v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1993
607 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-465

Submitted January 13, 1993 —

Decided February 24, 1993.

ON ORDER from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, Certifying a Question of State Law, No. 1:91CV1545.

Porter, Wright, Morris Arthur, Richard M. Markus and Ralph Streza, for petitioner. Quandt, Giffels, Buck Rodgers Co., L.P.A., Walter R. Matchinga and Jeffrey A. Schenk, for respondent.

Martin W. Williams and John K. Fitch, urging a negative answer to the certified question for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.


The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to us:

"Does Ohio Revised Code § 3929.06 preclude an injured person from bringing any action, including a declaratory judgment action, against the tortfeasor's insurer unless the injured person has first obtained a judgment against the insured?"

The certified question is answered in the negative.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krejci v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1993
607 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1993)
Case details for

Krejci v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KREJCI, EXR., v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 24, 1993

Citations

607 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1993)
607 N.E.2d 446

Citing Cases

Indiana Ins. Co. v. Murphy

{¶ 25} However, the clear and unambiguous language of both Sub. H.B. No. 58 and the statute preclude the…

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Consolidated Eq.

In the early 1990's, the Ohio Supreme Court approved direct actions by injured claimants to determine a…