From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krauthoff v. Compton

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nov 23, 1927
23 F.2d 73 (8th Cir. 1927)

Opinion

No. 7938.

November 23, 1927.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge.

See, also, 23 F.2d 71.

Edwin A. Krauthoff, of Kansas City, Mo. (Bruce W. Sanborn, of St. Paul, Minn., W.F. Lilleston, of Wichita, Kan., Ernest D. Wilson, of Kansas City, Mo., Sanborn, Graves Ordway, of St. Paul, Minn., and Vermilion, Evans, Carey Lilleston, of Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.

Rhodes E. Cave, of St. Louis, Mo. (Herman M. Langworthy, of Kansas City, Mo., Thomas S. McPheeters and Bryan, Williams Cave, all of St. Louis, Mo., and Langworthy, Spencer Terrell, of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for appellees.

Before LEWIS, Circuit Judge, and SCOTT, District Judge.



This suit is like those we have just considered and disposed of (Nos. 7874, 7875, 7939) 23 F.2d 71. It was brought by a creditor who owned bonds issued by Kansas City Joint-Stock Land Bank of Kansas City, Mo., in his own behalf and in behalf of all other creditors who might wish to join in the suit. The bill asks the court to appoint a receiver of the farm mortgages and United States government bonds pledged with C.A. Ryker, registrar, as security for the payment of the bonds. Ryker resides at Wichita, Kan., and the suit was brought in that district because that was the situs of the property that appellant sought to have impounded in receivership. The ultimate relief sought was the same as that in the other cases. It was alleged that controversies would arise in settlement of the insolvent estate, that neither Compton nor the Federal Farm Loan Board which appointed him receiver could exercise judicial functions, that creditors of the bank and its stockholders had a constitutional right to have those controversies determined judicially as they arose, and the bill asks that the court take possession of the assets held by Ryker through a receiver to be appointed by it and then proceed to administer the estate. The bill was dismissed on motion of appellees.

The order of dismissal is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the other cases.


Summaries of

Krauthoff v. Compton

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nov 23, 1927
23 F.2d 73 (8th Cir. 1927)
Case details for

Krauthoff v. Compton

Case Details

Full title:Edwin A. KRAUTHOFF, Appellant, v. William R. COMPTON, as Receiver of…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Nov 23, 1927

Citations

23 F.2d 73 (8th Cir. 1927)

Citing Cases

Partridge v. St. Louis Joint Stock Land Bank

on has failed to meet its outstanding obligations of any description the Federal Farm Loan Board may…

Krauthoff v. Kansas City Joint-Stock Land Bank

As the law under which the bonds owned by plaintiff were issued so provides, it must be held, in my judgment,…