From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kraus v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Jan 20, 2000
560 Pa. 220 (Pa. 2000)

Summary

holding trial court properly admitted evidence of pedestrian's alcohol consumption where responding officer detected scent of alcohol on pedestrian's breath following accident; hospital measured pedestrian's BAC level in excess of 0.25 percent within forty minutes of accident; and expert testimony established that, given BAC results, pedestrian's judgment and motor skills would have been severely impaired at time of accident

Summary of this case from Rohe v. Vinson

Opinion

[J-141-1999].

Decided January 20, 2000.

Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court dated April 3, 1998, at 2720 PHL 1997, affirming the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County entered August 19, 1997 at 92-09787-20-2, No. 64 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999.

Samuel Merovitz, James L. Rosenbaum, Philadelphia, for Timothy Kraus.

Thomas P. Bracaglia, Philadelphia, for James Taylor and Harris Fuel.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, and SAYLOR, JJ.


ORDER


The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.


Summaries of

Kraus v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Jan 20, 2000
560 Pa. 220 (Pa. 2000)

holding trial court properly admitted evidence of pedestrian's alcohol consumption where responding officer detected scent of alcohol on pedestrian's breath following accident; hospital measured pedestrian's BAC level in excess of 0.25 percent within forty minutes of accident; and expert testimony established that, given BAC results, pedestrian's judgment and motor skills would have been severely impaired at time of accident

Summary of this case from Rohe v. Vinson

holding trial court properly admitted evidence of pedestrian's alcohol consumption where responding officer detected scent of alcohol on pedestrian's breath following accident; hospital measured pedestrian's BAC level in excess of 0.25 percent within forty minutes of accident; and expert testimony established that, given BAC results, pedestrian's judgment and motor skills would have been severely impaired at time of accident

Summary of this case from Braun v. Target Corp.
Case details for

Kraus v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY KRAUS, Appellant, v. JAMES E. TAYLOR AND HARRIS FUEL, Appellees

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

Date published: Jan 20, 2000

Citations

560 Pa. 220 (Pa. 2000)
743 A.2d 451

Citing Cases

Octave ex rel. Octave v. Walker

Id....This Court is aware of the case of Kraus v. Taylor, 710 A.2d 1142 (Pa. Super. 1998)[, appeal dismissed,…

Octave ex rel. Octave v. Walker

Id..... This Court is aware of the case of Kraus v. Taylor, 710 A.2d 1142 (Pa.Super.1998)[, appeal dismissed,…