From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Korte v. Anderson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 3, 2008
CIV-S-07-1941 LEW EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-07-1941 LEW EFB PS.

March 3, 2008


ORDER


On February 12, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed February 12, 2008, are ADOPTED;

2. This action is dismissed without further leave to amend;

3. Plaintiff's renewed request for appointment of counsel is denied; and,

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Korte v. Anderson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 3, 2008
CIV-S-07-1941 LEW EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Korte v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE FRANCIS KORTE, Plaintiff, v. MONTE SELLS (dec'd) DANIELLE SELLS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

CIV-S-07-1941 LEW EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2008)