From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kordenbrock, v. Scroggy

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 20, 1990
896 F.2d 1457 (6th Cir. 1990)

Opinion

Nos. 88-5467, 89-5107.

February 20, 1990.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.


Summaries of

Kordenbrock, v. Scroggy

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 20, 1990
896 F.2d 1457 (6th Cir. 1990)
Case details for

Kordenbrock, v. Scroggy

Case Details

Full title:PAUL KORDENBROCK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. GENE SCROGGY, WARDEN, KENTUCKY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

896 F.2d 1457 (6th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Kordenbrock v. Scroggy

The suggestion for rehearing en banc was granted. Kordenbrock v. Scroggy, 896 F.2d 1457 (6th Cir. 1990). II.…