From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koepke v. Schumacher

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 11, 1944
324 Ill. App. 315 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,150. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed December 11, 1944 Rehearing denied December 26, 1944 Released for publication December 27, 1944

FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, § 200lack of jurisdiction in court to enter order setting aside decree. Where petition to vacate foreclosure decree was filed by codefendant, who had been defaulted because "not found," more than 13 months after sale and only some five weeks before expiration of period of redemption, held that residence affidavit, made by attorney for plaintiff, was sufficient to confer jurisdiction on court over such codefendant on notice by publication; that time for filing bill of review or petition under statute to set aside decree had expired; that writ of error coram nobis was inapplicable to chancery proceeding, and that trial court was without jurisdiction to enter order, no statement by court as to reasons for which order appeared in record, setting aside decree (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1943, ch. 110, pars. 138, 174; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.014, 104.050).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. HARRY M. FISHER, Judge, presiding.

Reversed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the October term, 1944.

Reuel H. Grunewald and Robert F. Kolb, for appellant.

Harold Omar Mulks, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 11, 1944; rehearing denied December 26, 1944; released for publication December 27, 1944.


Summaries of

Koepke v. Schumacher

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Dec 11, 1944
324 Ill. App. 315 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Koepke v. Schumacher

Case Details

Full title:Frank O. Koepke, Appellant, v. Peter J. Schumacher et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Dec 11, 1944

Citations

324 Ill. App. 315 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
58 N.E.2d 198

Citing Cases

Koepke v. Schumacher

He elected to abide by his answer, and an order in favor of Mrs, Campo was entered that the decree…

Campo v. Niemeyer

tate, and the real estate was thereafter sold to Koepke by a special commissioner appointed by the court to…