From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koechling v. Pyne

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 1, 1937
88 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1937)

Opinion

No. 282.

March 1, 1937.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Arthur J. Brothers and Epstein Brothers, all of New York City, for appellant.

Hardy, Stancliffe Hardy, of New York City (William F. McDermott and George T. Barker, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


Decree affirmed on the authority of Jennings v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co., 294 U.S. 216, 55 S.Ct. 394, 79 L.Ed. 869, 99 A.L.R. 1248, which has overruled, though without mention, the doctrine of Schumacher v. Harriett, 52 F.2d 817, 82 A.L.R. 1 (C.C.A.4).


Summaries of

Koechling v. Pyne

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 1, 1937
88 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1937)
Case details for

Koechling v. Pyne

Case Details

Full title:Emma KOECHLING, Appellant, v. Warner PYNE, as Receiver of the Pelham…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1937

Citations

88 F.2d 1012 (2d Cir. 1937)

Citing Cases

Bryant v. Linn County, Or.

These questions are intermingled, and solution depends upon whether federal law or state law should be…