From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knudsen v. New Dorp Coal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1967
27 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Summary

In Knudsen v. New Dorp Coal Corp. (27 A.D.2d 935, affd. 23 N.Y.2d 892) the radiator of plaintiff's car was damaged when defendant's truck backed into it, causing the anti-freeze liquid to drip out.

Summary of this case from Daas v. Pearson

Opinion

April 3, 1967


Judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 16, 1965, reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and new trial ordered, except with respect to the claim for property damage, with costs to abide the event. Findings of fact in the oral decision below inconsistent herewith are reversed. In our opinion, the evidence was sufficient to present a case for the jury on the issue of proximate cause. Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Knudsen v. New Dorp Coal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1967
27 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

In Knudsen v. New Dorp Coal Corp. (27 A.D.2d 935, affd. 23 N.Y.2d 892) the radiator of plaintiff's car was damaged when defendant's truck backed into it, causing the anti-freeze liquid to drip out.

Summary of this case from Daas v. Pearson
Case details for

Knudsen v. New Dorp Coal Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BESSIE A. KNUDSEN et al., Appellants, v. NEW DORP COAL CORP., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Daas v. Pearson

Furthermore, it should be noted that in the Provenzo case, the defendant Martenson's misconduct was not…