From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of K.M.B.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 29, 2016
885 N.W.2d 441 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

In A.B. v. C.B., 34 N.J. Eq. 43, the incurability was determined by a fruitless operation to remove the cause; in Fehr v. Fehr, 92 N.J. Eq. 316, by a condition resulting from a congenital disability for which surgical treatment had been given. The requirement for such proof has been stressed even where the statute of the jurisdiction did not so specify. Devanbagh v. Devanbagh, 5 Paige Ch. 554; 6Ibid.

Summary of this case from Heller v. Heller

Opinion

No. 15–0875.

06-29-2016

In the Interest of K.M.B. A.B., Mother, Petitioner–Appellee, C.B., Father, Respondent–Appellant.

Cole J. Mayer of Masterson, Bottenberg & Eichorn, L.L.P., Waukee, for appellant father. Scott D. Fisher of Fisher Law Firm, P.L.C., West Des Moines, for appellee mother.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Interest of K.M.B.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Jun 29, 2016
885 N.W.2d 441 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

In A.B. v. C.B., 34 N.J. Eq. 43, the incurability was determined by a fruitless operation to remove the cause; in Fehr v. Fehr, 92 N.J. Eq. 316, by a condition resulting from a congenital disability for which surgical treatment had been given. The requirement for such proof has been stressed even where the statute of the jurisdiction did not so specify. Devanbagh v. Devanbagh, 5 Paige Ch. 554; 6Ibid.

Summary of this case from Heller v. Heller
Case details for

In re Interest of K.M.B.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of K.M.B. A.B., Mother, Petitioner–Appellee, C.B., Father…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

885 N.W.2d 441 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Heller v. Heller

The burden was upon her to prove it. In A.B. v. C.B., 34 N.J. Eq. 43, the incurability was determined by a…