From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kmart Corporation v. Herzog

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-0800

Opinion filed July 16, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Catherine M. Brunson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 89-9981 AI.

Alicia M. Santana, G. Bart Billbrough and Geoffrey B. Marks of Walton Lantaff Schroeder Carson, Miami, for appellant.

Kimberly L. Boldt and Patrice A. Talisman of Russo Talisman, P.A., Miami, and Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


We cannot say that the order granting a new trial—on the grounds that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence is outside the broad discretion given to trial judges in such matters. See Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1959); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla. 1975); Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla. 1980), Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 1981); Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868 (Fla. 1988); Nicaise v. Gagnon, 597 So.2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). In affirming the new trial order, however, we do not do so because we agree that a new trial was required as a matter of law.

STONE, C.J., GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kmart Corporation v. Herzog

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 16, 1997
696 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Kmart Corporation v. Herzog

Case Details

Full title:KMART CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. MARCIA HERZOG AND MAX HERZOG, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 16, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Herzog v. K-Mart Corp.

In affirming the new trial order, however, we do not do so because we agree that a new trial was required as…