From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kling v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
May 3, 1949
9 F.R.D. 604 (S.D. Fla. 1949)

Opinion

         Action by Annie L. Kling against Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company.

         The United States District Court, Holland, J., entered an order denying defendant's motions to dismiss complaint and for more definite statement and granting oral motion for physical examination of plaintiff and required plaintiff to furnish defendant names and addresses of witnesses.

          W. Curry Harris, Key West, Fla., for plaintiff.

          Loftin & Wahl, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant.


          HOLLAND, District Judge.

         This cause coming on to be heard after notice and argument of counsel, on consideration it is ordered:

         1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is denied.

         2. Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement is denied.

         3. Defendant is allowed 30 days from date within which to file Answer to the Complaint.

         4. Defendant's oral motion for physical examination of the plaintiff is granted. The Court defers until a later date the naming of the doctor and the fixing of the time for such examination.

         5. Plaintiff is required to furnish defendant within 30 days the names and addresses of the witnesses known to her at this time which she proposes to introduce at the trial, provided that before using any additional witnesses she shall give time and notice of their names and addresses to defendant.


Summaries of

Kling v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
May 3, 1949
9 F.R.D. 604 (S.D. Fla. 1949)
Case details for

Kling v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co.

Case Details

Full title:KLING v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: May 3, 1949

Citations

9 F.R.D. 604 (S.D. Fla. 1949)

Citing Cases

Quatrano v. Marrocco

It has been so held in various decisions of the federal district courts, to be found in the Federal Rules…

Evtush v. Hudson Bus Transp. Co., Inc.

No question as to the plaintiffs' right to make their second demand, namely, for the names and addresses of…