From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klein-Bullock v. North Shore Univer Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

June 18, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Carey, J., and a jury), entered June 5, 2007, in an action for personal injuries and wrongful death alleging medical malpractice and general negligence, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.


The claimed errors in the verdict sheet are not preserved for appellate review since plaintiffs did not object thereto (CPLR 4110-b; see Suria v Shiftman, 67 NY2d 87, 97), and we decline to review them ( see Pagnotta v Diamond, 51 AD3d 1099, 1100). In any event, nothing in the record or verdict indicates that the jury was confused by the wording of the interrogatories ( cf. e.g. Herbert H. Post Co. v Sidney Bitterman, Inc., 219 AD2d 214, 223), and no issues were raised as to general negligence ( see McKoy v County of Westchester, 272 AD2d 307; Wahler v Lockport Physical Therapy, 275 AD2d 906, lv denied 96 NY2d 701) or res ipsa loquitur ( see Kruck v St. John's Episcopal Hosp., 228 AD2d 565) that should have been charged and submitted to the jury.


Summaries of

Klein-Bullock v. North Shore Univer Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 2009
63 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Klein-Bullock v. North Shore Univer Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE KLEIN-BULLOCK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
880 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Grace v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

However, defendant concedes that it failed to object to the verdict sheet. Thus, defendant failed to preserve…

Aguilar v. New York City Transit Authority

The error here was not fundamental because it did not "confuse[or] create[] doubt as to the principle of law…