From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klauer v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 31, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv541/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 31, 2009)

Summary

declining to address claim raised for the first time in a habeas petitioner's reply

Summary of this case from United States v. Adams

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv541/LAC/EMT.

July 31, 2009


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 24, 2009 (Doc. 45). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Klauer v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 31, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv541/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 31, 2009)

declining to address claim raised for the first time in a habeas petitioner's reply

Summary of this case from United States v. Adams
Case details for

Klauer v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:PETER JOSEPH KLAUER, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv541/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Adams

A traverse typically may not be used to raise for the first time facts to support a ground for relief, or an…

Kline v. State

This claim is not properly before this Court and should not be considered. See, e.g., Tyler v. Mitchell, 416…