From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KLAR v. A.J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTION CORP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1999
266 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1999

December 2, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated September 29, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho, N.Y. (Susan E. Lysaght of counsel), for appellant.

Wolf Hoffman, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Thomas Torto and Lawrence B. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The Supreme Court erred in finding that the defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendant submitted evidence, in the form of its daily work reports and the deposition testimony of its project engineer, which demonstrated that it was not performing any work in the area where the plaintiff's decedent tripped and fell (see, Soto v. City of New York, 244 A.D.2d 544 ; Abbenante v. Tyree Co., 228 A.D.2d 529 ;Hovi v. City of New York, 226 A.D.2d 430 ). The plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion did not create a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant was working in the area where the plaintiff's decedent fell. The plaintiff's opposition was based solely upon speculation that the defendant's construction activity was the cause of her decedent's fall (see, Lee v. Rite Aid of New York, 261 A.D.2d 368 [2d Dept., May 3, 1999]; Gianchetta v. E. B. Marine, Inc., 258 A.D.2d 618 [2d Dept., Feb. 22, 1999]).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., McGINITY, FEUERSTEIN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

KLAR v. A.J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTION CORP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1999
266 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

KLAR v. A.J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTION CORP

Case Details

Full title:MILDRED KLAR, etc., respondent, v. A.J. PEGNO CONSTRUCTION CORP., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 434 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

Goldblatt v. LaShellda Maintenance Company

After LaShellda established a prima facie case of its entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed…