From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 1978
358 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Summary

In Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services, Inc., 358 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), a final judgment was entered which did not include attorney's fees for plaintiff. The trial court allowed a motion to amend the final judgment under Rule 1.540 and awarded attorney's fees.

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Bailey

Opinion

No. 77-2002.

May 9, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Thomas A. Testa, J.

Alan E. Fallik, Legal Aid Service of Broward County, Inc., Hollywood, for appellant.

Friedman Britton and J.T. Haley, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C.J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.


On January 19, 1977, the trial court entered a default final judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant. The judgment did not include an award of attorney's fees for the plaintiff. The parties, by their respective attorneys, thereafter entered into a stipulation which provided: (1) The final judgment was to be vacated. (2) The defendant admitted an indebtedness ". . . for the principal sum of $2,700.81, plus interest in the sum of $335.25, plus court costs in the amount of $48.00, for a total of $3,084.06." (3) The defendant agreed to make "monthly payments." (4) The plaintiff would be permitted to take judgment without notice ". . . in the event of default in any one payment . . . for the remaining balance due and owing . . ." The trial court ratified and executed the stipulation.

The defendant defaulted and a final judgment, dated June 29, 1977, was entered. The judgment did not include attorney's fees.

The plaintiff, on July 28, 1977, ". . . move[d] to amend the Final Judgment . . ." upon the ground that "[t]he original Judgment failed to include attorney's fees to which the plaintiff is entitled." On August 18, 1977, the trial judge entered an amended final judgment and included $350.00 as attorney's fees for the plaintiff.

The motion to amend final judgment was not timely under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.530(g). See Allen v. Allen, 230 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). The motion was not a proper motion under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540. Cf. Kuykendall v. Kuykendall, 301 So.2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). The inclusion of attorney's fees contravenes the stipulation of the parties.

The final judgment, dated August 18, 1977, is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings upon the judgment entered June 29, 1977.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 9, 1978
358 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

In Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services, Inc., 358 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), a final judgment was entered which did not include attorney's fees for plaintiff. The trial court allowed a motion to amend the final judgment under Rule 1.540 and awarded attorney's fees.

Summary of this case from Robinson v. Bailey
Case details for

Kitzmiller v. Southeast Services

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET E. KITZMILLER, APPELLANT, v. SOUTHEAST SERVICES, INC., ETC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 9, 1978

Citations

358 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Tompkins v. Kraemer

Because the motion was untimely served, the trial court lost jurisdiction to alter or amend the judgment.…

Robinson v. Bailey

"Rule 1.540 was intended to provide relief from judgments, decrees or orders under a limited set of…