From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitts v. Hanna

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 10, 1928
29 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1928)

Opinion

No. 3863.

December 10, 1928.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Affirming decree 29 F.2d 1010.

Benjamin H. Ludlow, and Powell, Ludlow Schaeffer, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Kingsley Montgomery and J.H. Ward Hinkson, both of Chester, Pa., for appellee Cambridge Trust Co.

E.A. Howell, of Chester, Pa., for appellee Hanna.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


On the question whether the court below was justified in dismissing this bill on the ground of laches, we find ourselves in complete accord therewith. Its decree is therefore affirmed. See authorities on the subject of laches quoted in Hemmick v. Standard Oil Co. (C.C.A.) 91 F. 334.


Summaries of

Kitts v. Hanna

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Dec 10, 1928
29 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1928)
Case details for

Kitts v. Hanna

Case Details

Full title:Katharine W. KITTS et al., Appellants, v. James HANNA, Administrator of…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 1928

Citations

29 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1928)